Skip to main content
Request a demo
Legal

Accessibility Statement

What has been done, what has been checked, and what has not been tested.

Last updated 21 August 2026

What counts as evidenceThree rows. A control described in a document is unticked; a control enforced by code and one refused by the database are ticked. Only the second and third are evidence that something holds.Described in a documentEnforced by codeRefused by the database

Before you rely on this

This statement describes the accessibility of this platform against WCAG 2.2 Level AA. It is written to be checkable rather than reassuring, so it says plainly which claims rest on testing and which do not.

1. What we aim for

We aim to meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA throughout. Accessibility is treated as a defect class rather than a feature: a contrast failure or an unreachable control is a bug and is fixed as one.

2. What has been done

  • Semantic landmarks and a skip link on every page.
  • Every interactive element reachable and operable by keyboard, with a visible focus indicator that is not clipped by any scrolling region.
  • Text contrast checked against the surface it actually renders on, not against an assumed background.
  • Motion driven by scroll is disabled entirely under prefers-reduced-motion, and no content depends on it being seen.
  • Form fields have programmatically associated labels, and errors are announced rather than only coloured.
  • Diagrams carry a title and a description; none conveys information by colour alone.

3. What has not been tested

No screen reader has been used against this build, and no automated accessibility checker has been run against it. No independent audit has taken place. The conformance claim above is therefore a statement of design intent supported by manual checks, and not a tested result.

We would rather say that than publish a conformance badge nobody verified.

4. Telling us about a problem

If something is unusable, please tell us at ACCESSIBILITY CONTACT and describe what you were trying to do. We will acknowledge within ACKNOWLEDGEMENT PERIOD. If you are not satisfied with the response, you may escalate under ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE.

Before this page is published

The highlighted terms above are facts about a specific legal entity that this draft does not know. Each must be supplied, and the whole document reviewed by qualified counsel, before anybody relies on it.

  • AN INDEPENDENT AUDIT by a qualified accessibility tester
  • ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURE reference required in the operator’s jurisdiction